writerdebarun.com

Tag: psychology

  • A Brief Study of 6 Unique Mind-Bending Paradoxes

    A Brief Study of 6 Unique Mind-Bending Paradoxes

    Introduction

    Paradoxes are logical conundrums or puzzles that have no definite solutions. From philosophers to scientists, intellectuals have always invented different paradoxical models over the centuries. In this blog post, we discuss six such unique paradoxes that challenge human cognition and logic.

    Chapter 1: The Grandfather Paradox

    It is a paradox that arises with the concept of time travel. Suppose a man travels through time and kills his paternal grandfather before the birth of his father. At first, the thought may come that the solution is simple: the man won’t be born then. But if we think critically, we find that, as the man won’t be born, he won’t be able to kill his grandfather, and thus he will be born, thus creating a never-ending loop. The Grandfather paradox has practically no solution and has been studied by theoretical physicists as well as science-fiction writers.

    Chapter 2: The Bootstrap Paradox

    It is another temporal paradox. Suppose a time-traveler from the future travels through time and gives a young Albert Einstein the idea of relativity. Einstein later used this idea as inspiration and proposed the theories of special and general relativity. These theories, centuries later, inspire the younger time traveler to build the time machine. Then, exactly whose original idea is relativity? The question has no definite answer, and the paradox is known as the bootstrap paradox.

    Chapter 3: The Sorites Paradox

    Also known as the Paradox of the Heap, it is an ancient paradox that states if removing one grain of sand from a large heap doesn’t stop the heap from continuing to be one, then exactly when, after how many grains would the heap lose its identity? Philosophers and logicians over the millennia have proposed numerous solutions for this problem throughout the millennia, but still, it has no conclusive objective answer.

    Chapter 4: The Paradox of Tolerance

    It is a philosophical paradox that asks if a society tolerates everything, including those who are extremely intolerant, does the tolerance of the society still exist? This is a social paradox that raises the question of true tolerance and whether indefinite tolerance is possible.

    Chapter 5: The Barber Paradox

    This classical paradox arises from the question if a barber is a person who shaves all men who don’t shave themselves, then who shaves the barber? By definition, the barber doesn’t shave any person who can shave themselves.

    Chapter 6: The Omnipotence Paradox

    This is a theological and philosophical paradox. It asks, “Can an all-powerful, omnipotent being create a rock such that even that being cannot lift it?” If the being can’t create that rock, then he or she is not all-powerful, and if the rock is created that can’t be lifted even by the being, then too the question of ultimate omnipotence remains. This paradox has been raised by various scientists and philosophers over time, and objected to by many theologians.

    Conclusion

    These paradoxes have no definite answers and often appear in logic, philosophy, physics, psychology, and even theology, resulting in unending mental gymnastics. They have also inspired intellectuals in the research and creation, thereby aiding human cognitive evolution.

    You can read the original full blog post published in theindicscholar.com by me here

  • Understanding Popular Fallacies and Biases in a Simplistic Way

    Understanding Popular Fallacies and Biases in a Simplistic Way

    Introduction

    We often see a well-educated, rational person making the most illogical decision one could expect. Why does an intelligent human behave in such a baffling way, believing in irrational ideas and indulging in senseless practices? Well, this is due to some hidden glitches that shape critical thinking. Humans take shortcuts, relying on habits and being influenced by emotions. These shortcuts are known as cognitive biases, and the common errors that they make in their reasoning are known as logical fallacies. In this blog posts we discuss the most common fallacies and biases that are very important when understanding the science of the human mind.

    Logical Fallacies

    1. Ad Hominem Fallacy: It is the act of attacking the person making an argument instead of the argument itself. This is often used by desperate people in an attempt to win an argument by questioning the intelligence, ethics, logic, and even the qualifications of the opposition.
    2. Strawman Fallacy: In this error, the person making the fallacy deliberately misrepresents the opponent’s arguments, so that it can be easier to refute. It is a dangerous tool, where the opposition’s argument can be turned into a laughable parody, even if the argument is reasonably sound.
    3. False Dilemma: This fallacy happens when only two options are presented as the only possible solutions, although many more options exist, leading to a false dichotomy of choice.
    4. Circular Reasoning: It is the error when one person claims that A is because of B, and B is because of A, thereby repeating the same argument again and again without progressing to any conclusion.
    5. Appeal to Authority: Here, a person argues that something is true because an authority on that matter says so, however illogical it may sound. It is a very common fallacy used especially in academic and professional circles.
    6. Appeal to Emotion: When a person tries to win an argument by manipulating emotions instead of logic and facts, the fallacy is called appeal to emotion. Here, the person using the fallacy may play the victim, thereby gaining the audience’s sympathy through emotions.
    7. Bandwagon Fallacy: When a person believes or does something because everyone else believes or does so, it is known as bandwagon fallacy. Here, the person joins the bandwagon of the contemporary practice and even defends it without any logic or reason.
    8. Red Herring: It is the act of diverting attention from the topic to a totally irrelevant topic. It is named after the Red Herring fish, whose odor can distract even a well-trained bloodhound.

    Cognitive Biases

    1. Confirmation Bias: It is the act of seeking information that supports one’s existing beliefs, while neglecting all the information that goes against it. We often make this bias intentionally or unintentionally.
    2. Anchoring Bias: When a person relies on or anchors on the first piece of information to judge or perceive other information, this bias is called anchoring bias.
    3. Negativity Bias: In this bias, a person only focuses on the negative experiences over a certain topic, even though similar or more positive experiences are reported from the same topic.
    4. Halo Effect: When one positive trait influences the perception of all other negative traits, the bias is known as the Halo effect. For example, in movies, we generally have an attractive lead, thereby creating the bias that all attractive individuals are good at heart.
    5. Status Quo Bias: This bias is created due to the tendency to prefer things to remain the same forever, even if they are harmful, as the person with the bias has already become habituated with that.
    6. Recency Bias: A very popular bias, this act occurs when one gives importance to recent events over older ones, even if they deserve more importance.
    7. Illusory Correlation: It is the tendency to see connections between two independent events, even if they are totally unrelated.
    8. Authority Bias: Similar to appeal to authority, this bias happens when we blindly believe someone about a topic, as the person is considered an expert in the field. We give preference to the authority over our reason in believing the person’s words or acts.

    Conclusion

    Human behavior is a very exciting and intriguing topic. And interestingly, the so-called most intelligent species makes its decisions clouded by fallacies and biases. True intelligence isn’t about never being wrong. It’s about knowing when our brain is fooling us and daring to question it.

    References

    You can also read my original blog post published in theindicscholar.com by clicking here.